CIPD 5CO01 Assignment Example | Organizational Performance and Culture in Practice

Executive Summary

This paper examines many facets of an organization’s strategic planning. The report is divided into six distinct sections. The first section discusses organisational structure and how the many parts of an organisation work together to achieve a shared objective, as well as providing examples of hierarchical and functional organisational structures. The second section addresses the connection between organisational strategy and revenue and products. The third component consists of an external examination of the case study organisation, BMC, utilising the PESTLE analysis tool, as well as the results of this analysis. The fourth section investigates existing difficulties and their root causes, identifying critical priorities that impact product/service delivery.

The fifth section explains how people practises may have an impact on organisational systems and structures, hence affecting the successful employment, management, and development of people, while the final chapter examines how technology affects people, work, and working practises.

Evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the organisation structure in your organisation (or an organisation with which you are familiar) and evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of one other organisation structure. Within the evaluation, you should include the reasons underpinning the structure. (AC 1.1)

Organization structures and the reasons underpinning them. (AC 1.1)

There are several organisational systems available, and each has unique advantages as well as disadvantages. The hierarchical structure and the flat structure are two noteworthy models among them.

Hierarchical Structure

This system includes multiple managerial levels, each with defined duties, a distinct chain of command, and an obvious power hierarchy. In addition to providing distinct lines of authority and decision-making, hierarchical structures are useful for managing large, complex organisations and for utilising specialised expertise (Shrestha et al., 2019).

Advantages

• By defining distinct channels for decision-making and lines of authority, this framework speeds up the decision-making process (Shrestha et al., 2019).
• Within the hierarchy, various managerial levels can concentrate on gaining expert knowledge and abilities, which will improve overall performance.

Disadvantages

• Because decisions must be approved by several levels of authority, a rigid chain of command can make it difficult to be flexible and may even discourage employee initiative and creativity.
• The well-defined hierarchy may encourage resistance to change by impeding the adoption of novel concepts.

Flat Structure

A flat organisational structure places an emphasis on direct communication between upper management and staff, with few tiers of intermediate management. This system places a high value on cooperation, open communication, and teamwork, which promotes adaptability and change. Its goals are to increase efficiency, empower workers, cut down on bureaucracy, and promote innovation(Shrestha et al., 2019).

Advantages

• With fewer managerial tiers, a flat structure allows employees direct access to decision-makers, facilitating swift discussion and implementation of novel ideas (Shrestha et al., 2019).
• Fewer levels of management empower workers with more decision-making authority, leading to increased job satisfaction and motivation.
• By minimizing bureaucracy and enhancing flexibility, a flat structure expedites and refines processes.

Disadvantages

• With fewer managerial levels, employees may lack the specialized skills required for certain tasks, potentially resulting in a lack of expertise (Shrestha et al., 2019).
• In complex enterprises, a flat structure’s limited managerial tiers and flexible decision-making can lead to confusion and wasted time.

Organizations must carefully evaluate their specific needs and objectives when choosing between hierarchical and flat structures, considering the benefits and drawbacks of each approach.